I was in
As a country out of war and treading the slim path of democracy,
One thing that is certain for sure is the composition of the new democratic government. Ms. Johnson-Sirleaf has ensured that all parties are brought on deck to move the country forward including those of the past president Charles Taylor. Her cabinet of ministers are composed of persons including those in the opposition. She has extended several invitations to persons in order that they may participate in a government that is reconciliatory and yet proactive in bringing
The poor state of the country is indeed evident. Government offices, ministries and cabinets are housed in nearly dilapidated buildings once evident of their vibrance, prestige and glory but now in a state of shambles and degradation. Air conditioners in office building are non functional. Meetings are conducted at near mid-boiling point temperatures; power cables hang off ceilings and the walls are long overdue for a coat of paint. The adhoc power generating plant can no longer uphold the power requirement of The Capitol as all electronic devices are turned on at the same time – computers, air conditioners, refrigerators, light bulbs, etc demand power from an incapable source. Yet the people trudge along making no mention of their working environment but rather focusing squarely on the task at hand – rebuilding the country.
Very rarely do we see governments in
The work of rebuilding
The civil society organizations are themselves working to ensure that that arm of the governed grows along the lines of democracy – such as it meets the standards for which civil society should usually engage with government. There are visible efforts and signs show the willingness to grow and become more engaging. However, the level of knowledge in the engagement process is a far cry from the usual. Capacity needs to be built in the civil society – the capacity to engage. Up until now, they have engaged in forms of advocacy critical and contrary to the movement for peace. Advocacy had taken the shape of violence and guns have replaced the word and activism in the fight for relevance amongst the governed. It will be a long time before the concept of negotiation without violence in entrenched – perhaps a generation or two. Otherwise a civil society grouping will emerge (and indeed exists) that are not intune with today’s democratic principles, do not comprehend the art of negotiating with governments and do not know the basics for presenting a viable and relevant searchlight to the needs of the people. A Liberian orange revolution may never happen but the willingness to impact on governance and the governance process may be well on course.

0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home